Comparison of Models for the Prediction of Hydrodynamic Parameters in Structured Packing Columns for Biogas Purification

Hamadi Cherif

Abstract


This work compares three existing models used for the prediction of hydrodynamic parameters in structured packing columns. These models are used to evaluate pressure drop, liquid holdup, effective interfacial area, mass transfer coefficients and transition points.  The results of these models are compared to experimental data in order to choose the one with the best fit. The comparisons were made using Flexipac 350Y structured packing and two systems: Air – Water and Air – Kerosol 200. The model chosen is based on semi-empirical correlations using constants and exponents defined according to experimental measurements. To make the model more representative of the system of interest, these constants were modified and some exponents have been adjusted based on the superficial liquid velocity and density. Once the model modified, the results of pressure drop were compared to data from an industrial pilot plant treating 85 Nm3/h of biogas which contains about 30 ppm of hydrogen sulfide treated in a structured packing column.


Total Views: 165

Keywords


Hydrodynamics; structured packings; pressure drop; liquid holdup; effective interfacial area

Full Text:

PDF

References


Strigle, R. F. Jr., 1994, “Packed tower design and applications, Random and structured packings, second edition.”.

EIGA Publication AHG IGC 1.1. Carbon Dioxide Source Certification, Qualify Standards and Verification. European Industrial Gases Association. 1999.

www.cryopur.com (Cryo Pur® company), 25/07/2016.

Chan, H. and Fair, J. R., 1983, “Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development.” 23-814.

Paquet, E. F., 2011, “Establishing a facility to measure the efficiency of structured packing under total reflux.” MSc, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.

Schultes, M., 2010. “Research on mass transfer columns "Old hat or still relevant ?".” Distillation Absorption, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 37-42.

Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1993. “A physical model for the prediction of liquid hold-up in two-phase counter-current columns.” Chemical Engineering & Technology, 16:370-375.

Bravo, J. L., Rocha, J. A. and Fair, J. R., 2000, “A comprehensive model for the performance of columns containing structured packings.” Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 128, Birmingham, 1:A489-A507.

Olujić, Ž., Behrens, M., Colli, L. and Paglianti, A., 2004, “Predicting the efficiency of corrugated sheet structured packings with large specific surface area.” Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly 18:89-96.

Billet, R. and Schultes, M., 1999, “Prediction of mass transfer columns with dumped and arranged packings: Updated summary of the calculation method of Billet and Schultes.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 77:498-504.

Lamprecht, S. M., 2010. “Establishing a facility to measure packed column hydrodynamics.” MSc, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.

Erasmus, A. B., 2004, “Mass transfer in structured packing.” Thesis, Departement of Process Engineering at the University of Stellenbosch.

Gualito, J. J., Cerino, F. J., Cardenas, J. C. and Rocha, J. A., 1997, “Design method for distillation columns filled with metallic, ceramic, or plastic structured packings.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 36:1747-1757.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 1309-0127

www.ijrer.org

ijrereditor@gmail.com; ilhcol@gmail.com;

IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Thomson Reuters)